Something I noticed: 5×07 promotional videos with Nadalind kissing. Happy Nadalind fans getting excited. The vast majority of Silverhardt fans being respectfully quiet and not yelling at the Nadalind fans. 6×07 promo: Silverhardt kissing. Silverhardt haters ALL OVER that video, yelling at the ship and Juliette. Attacking any Silverhardt fan who dares show their support. đŸ˜’

I can neither confirm nor deny that this is true, but I can say it lines up with my fandom experiences for the last six years.

That being said, this is for all the fans, Nadalind, Silverhardt, slash shipper, or indifferent: stop. attacking. each other. Discourse is one thing, but jumping on each other because you ship different things is just painfully immature, not to mention unnecessary.

I mean…what does anyone get out of that? Moreover, what do you think it says about your ship to the rest of the fandom, if all they ever see is its shippers attacking people, and putting down other ships, characters, and even the actors who play them?

So cut it out. And if you see other fans doing it, maybe tell them to cut it out too. We have seven episodes left. Just seven! After that last episode airs and the credits roll, it will never be like this again. Ever. Sure, there’ll be new metas, maybe, the occasional new fic or fanart, fans discovering the show for the first time on streaming sites and blogging about it.

But there won’t be anymore of that “new episode this Friday!” feeling we get now. There won’t be any more promos, sneak peaks, new photos from the next ep, theorizing about what wild thing the writers will think of next. No more of the writers trolling us good-naturedly during hiatus. No more of Bitsie giving names to things, or posting drinking games during the episode.

It’s going to be different, it’s going to feel different. And while we’ll always have the show to go back to, it will be going back. Never forward. We’ll be loving something that was, not something that is.

So enjoy this now, while we can. And try to remember that whatever our different opinions are on various parts of the show, we all love this show. We have that in common. And we’re all gonna miss it when it’s gone.

Hi. I’ve been watching grimm since day one and I’m unhappy about how they forced Nick and Adalind together. Just because they have a kid together doesn’t make it right. Nick gets tricked into sleeping with her and now he loves her? I try to point out to people that no one would ship them if gender roles were reversed. What do you think?

I would like to think you’re right, and that people would at least recognize the very obvious male predator dynamic, but considering there are people who ship things like Jessica Jones/Kilgrave, which is a man preying on a woman and is also very clearly and literally shown/declared to be rape in canon, I’m afraid not.

See, erasure of male victims and the notion that women can’t be rapists is only part of the equation. The other part of it is that rape culture and abuse apologism are so prevalent in our entertainment that people actually think a lot of abusive, stalkery behavior is romantic. Just look at the popularity of Twilight when it came out, which was basically “Abusive Relationships With Vampires: The Saga.”

Or go further back and get out of sci-fi a bit, you’ll still see it everywhere. Take Ross and Rachel from Friends, where Ross was controlling, condescending, dismissive, and all-around a dick but was supposed to be seen as a “nice guy” because he liked to be monogamous. Or how about that creepy-ass scene in the car near the end of Breakfast at Tiffany’s, where the guy was like “I love you, you belong to me.”

The elected president of the United States is a known rapist. David Bowie, celebrated rock icon, is a known child rapist. And in both cases supporters will try to make excuses for why those rapes didn’t happen, or don’t count. Ten years ago scores of fans came out of the woodwork to blame Rihanna and adore Chris Brown when the latter beat the former so severely she was unrecognizable. Women tweeted “I would let him beat me up any day” in response. Last year, fans did something similar regarding Johnny Depp’s well-documented abuse of his wife, Amber Heard.

Rape culture and abuse apologism are everywhere. They’re in every romantic comedy where a busy, brilliant, independent woman is secretly lonely and miserable and just needs the “right man” to come show her how to be a woman the “right way.” They’re in bodice-ripper romance novels, where the scenario of a woman saying no to sex is painted as a challenge rather than the end of the conversation. They’re in the notion that men always want sex (or even “need” it) and women never do unless convinced. They’re in the idea that healthy relationships are boring but violent relationships are “passionate.”

That shit is literally all over our entertainment and culture, and so…no, sadly, I don’t think if Nick were a woman and Adalind were a man people would ship it less or not at all. They would just use a slightly different tack to justify it.

I just wrote a really long post on one of your response to an ask. I’m really sorry if it offended you or is an inconvenience. It is just that i was getting tired of all the ship wars. Going into the tags becomes exhausting instead of fun. The nadalind shippers going after juliette and the nickette shippers going after adalind. They are both amazing characters whose storylines are not nicely handled by the writers. So anyway i’m so sorry that i high jacked your post.

No worries! Believe me, I feel you on the ship war exhaustion. I don’t even go into the fandom tags for certain characters or ships anymore because I know I’m not going to see anything but wank.

That being said, it’s worth noting that opponents of Nadalind sometimes have very good reasons for why they feel the way they do about that ship. There’s a whole Marianas Trench of difference between “I don’t like this ship, it’s not my bag” and “one of these characters raped the other one and therefore the thought of them in a romantic or sexual relationship squicks me the hell out and sends a terrible message that perpetuates rape culture.” I’ve even heard from multiple fans that they were too triggered by the show taking it canon to continue watching last season. So. Just gonna leave that there.

But in the interest of helping people avoid The Discourse surrounding the whole Juliette/Adalind/Nadalind/Silverhardt mess the show and fans have gotten snarled into, maybe a tag specifically for that would be a good idea? That way if you want to blacklist it you can, and this can at least be one blog where you don’t have to see any more of that ongoing discussion/argument if you don’t want to. Because we really try to stay away from pitting women against each other or engaging with ship wars, but…well, it comes up in the asks a lot (like enough that we started deleting what were basically the same questions/comments being submitted over and over), and I’m an argumentative little shit who can’t not give 5000-word responses when I strongly disagree with something someone has written. So. 

The tag will be “hexendebate” (all one word to make sure it’s caught by Tumblr Savior and the like), and it will be added to any posts, reblogs, replies, or ask answers that veer into comparing/contrasting/pitting the two women or ships against one another.

I would rather Nick be single, or else be involved for some new character. But since the writers so clearly set it up that it would either be Juliette or Adalind (and confirmed this in interviews) I guess what I’m saying is that I understand why people would ship Nick and Adalind. I don’t like it, what she did was gross and wrong, but the entire thing with all three of them is so messed up and not handled very well by the show.

I wouldn’t want Nick to suddenly become involved with a new character here at the very end. That would seem…cheap and rushed and out-of-nowhere, to me. There wouldn’t really be time to develop the character or the relationship well and take care of all the other stuff they need to answer and deal with.

I will say this: I do understand why people would ship Nick and Adalind, both before and after the rape at the end of season 3. I understand as in comprehend, not as in agree with, support, condone, or ship it myself.

I understand it for two reasons: 1) we are trained from birth by the things we see portrayed in media to process antagonism, dominance, violence, and aggression as evidence of passion rather than abuse, and 2) we are not trained to think critically about the importance and nature of true consent, or to see men as potential victims of rape and women as potential perpetrators.

I can also definitely agree that the show hasn’t handled either relationship perfectly or even very well, and they definitely screwed up with the way they explained hexenbiest powers and the way they supposedly affect people. They broke their own continuity in that regard, and they’ve made it so their two main contenders for Nick’s affections at the end are a woman who doesn’t deserve him and a woman he doesn’t deserve.

Nadalind as a ship is unsalvageable from the standpoint of being healthy or positive in any way. Even if you argue that she did what she did under duress and because she was a hexenbiest, there are things in canon that contradict both conclusions and it doesn’t change the fact that Nick was still violated.

And even as much as I love Silverhardt, I can fully acknowledge that the writers would have to do a whole lot of work to make anything between them remotely healthy again…work I’m not convinced they really have time to do. Nick’s tendency to deceive Juliette and dismiss her feelings whenever convenient for him was a problem from like the third or fourth episode of the first season, and one they’ve never fully addressed.

Still, at the end of the day I know it’s going to be one or the other of the two. And in that context, I can wrap my head around Nick ending up with someone he needs to work on his relationship with over his ending up someone who literally raped him as well as one of his best friends, any day of the week.

I see so many people who support Nick and Adiland together but I just….. don’t like them together is it just me?

It’s not just you, anon. Given the massive ratings plunge last season and the number of people who’ve said they stopped watching the show because of it, I think it’s a case of those fans being the loudest, not the most numerous.

In any case, it is absolutely not a ship this blog or any of its admins supports, for reasons you can find all over the ship’s tag here.

With the whole Juliette thing it makes sense that nick would have been uncomfortable + even scared/nervous given that he’s had a lot of bad experiences with hexenbiests and very little-no positive ones. He’d need time + while Juliette has the right to be hurt + upset by that (and to leave) the way she treated him wasn’t right since a healthy relationship means both people are comfortable + agree + theirs turned toxic + Juliette abusive. Including to their friends with nick being the main target.

(2/3) *so I’m glad that the relationship’s ended (+ hopefully won’t start again since that would be bad for both of them.) adalind did a lot of bad things too to people he cared about (the people who had her do it are at to blame too) + nick helped take her baby + powers from her which means there’s a lot of hate anger + mistrust between them. Not exactly the basis for a healthy relationship + I think after she took kelly he’s probably not going to trust leaving her alone with him. Her mother was also

(3/3) *also abusive given what I’ve seen of how she treated adalind, + that might have played a part in some of what she did. Doesn’t excuse it tho. She also acted out on them when they took her baby + nobody was in the right there, given that they took her baby (even if we can understand WHY they still took her kid from her) and she acted out on them for it (which again, wasn’t right but we can see why she did it, + she was desperate to have her child back.) the whole thing with adalind’s complicated

Well Anon…there are a few things I’d like to respond to here. Forgive me if this is a little incoherent, but you put a lot into those three asks and I want to make sure I touch on all of it at least a bit.

First, I think we all agree that it was perfectly reasonable for Nick to need time to deal with what was happening to Juliette. But here’s the thing that so many people seem to forget, anon: he had time.

The scene where Juliette tells him what has happened to her, the scene where she’s hurt that he can’t even look at her, and the scene where she leaves are three completely different scenes with a lot of space and time between them. In the first, she isn’t angry with him at all. She’s upset, fighting tears and visibly terrified. And Nick’s response to this isn’t to tell her that he needs time to figure this out. He doesn’t take the time to do even the bare minimum to communicate to the woman he claims to love that he isn’t going to just desert her.

Instead, he just leaves her there. Crying, alone, in their shattered house where she’s just been attacked. And it doesn’t matter that she fended off that attack incredibly well. If a friend or loved one survived an attack and sent their attacker running, would you leave them completely alone and crying right after? I wouldn’t, not under any circumstances. If I was too upset to stay with them, I would call another friend of ours to do so. What if Adalind had come back with reinforcements?

But Nick wasn’t thinking about Juliette’s safety or her feelings, or whether this whole experience was traumatizing for her. The only thing that mattered to him in that moment was how he felt about the situation. And this isn’t a special circumstance, either, something that can be explained by Nick’s trauma related to hexenbiests and a resulting fear of them (especially considering how easily he gets over that fear later, toward the actual source of his trauma no less).

No, Nick’s lack of concern for Juliette’s feelings or well-being is part of a pattern in their relationship that goes all the way back to season one, and that Juliette calls him out for when she does leave…not that he really seemed to listen to her and let what she was saying sink in. Then of course, he doesn’t talk to her about it at all, not at any point. He talks to Hank instead, and basically forces her to tell their entire group of friends before she’s ready.

Now before I get more into their relationship’s messed-up dynamic, I wanna just toss out that a healthy relationship does NOT mean both partners always agree. That would be virtually impossible. A healthy relationship does involve mutual respect, support, and caring, and that is something that was definitely lacking in Nick and Juliette’s relationship. But I don’t think it’s fair to say that their relationship “turned” unhealthy and toxic when Juliette changed, or to lay that solely at Juliette’s door by calling her abusive.

Their relationship, whether Nick himself wanted to acknowledge it or not, was over the moment he walked out and left Juliette crying in their living room. While Juliette getting angry at Nick and going to start a fight in a bar (when he forced her to tell everyone before she was ready) wasn’t necessarily healthy for her, it wasn’t abuse. And while Juliette burning down Nick’s trailer and attacking his friends (when they tried to force a temporary cure on her that she didn’t want) wasn’t nice and was certainly violent, it wasn’t one partner abusing the other.

That doesn’t make the situation okay or healthy or good…but I don’t see Juliette fighting Nick and their friends as abuse any more than I see Juliette and Adalind duking it out with their powers as abuse. It’s violence, to be sure, but it lacks the unbalanced power dynamics and other features that characterize abuse patterns in relationships.

On the other hand, their relationship prior to Juliette’s change did display several patterns of abuse, and they came from Nick, not from Juliette. Their relationship was unhealthy and parasitic from at least mid-season one. Nick used abuse tactics such as gaslighting on Juliette throughout seasons one and two, and repeatedly dismissed or ignored her needs in favor of his own even after she knew the truth and they were supposed to be on the same page. She was VERY supportive of his life as a Grimm, even though she found it strange and often frightening. And as long as she was being unconditionally pro-Grimm, things were fine. But whenever she tried to express her concerns, fears, or misgivings, he brushed her off. He even lied to her about Trubel when she first showed up, near the end of season three.

Where we can agree on the Juliette/Silverhardt front is that I’m also glad their relationship has ended. I loved them together when the show first started, but things went downhill fast, and the primary victim of that spiral has always been Juliette, even after she became a hexenbiest. Heck, the very existence of Eve is in part a product of the traumas Juliette suffered. The only way I would ever support the two of them getting back together would be if they actually addressed all the problems that led to the end of their previous relationship and showed a definite change in Nick’s treatment toward her. And honestly, given the short order for season 6 and the definite possibility that this will be the show’s last season, I don’t see them having time to give the characters the space, time, and healing they would both need in order to remotely approach being able to realistically resolve/resume their relationship issues.

As for your thoughts on Adalind, I think you’re probably right that her mother was abusive and most likely also neglectful. Adalind herself has hinted that her relationship with her mother was an unsupportive one, that her mother was only there for her in death. And the events at the end of season one clearly showed that Catherine’s affection was conditional, based on Adalind doing/saying/being the “right” thing. The moment Adalind was a “disappointment,” Catherine withdrew all emotional support and affection. That is definitely an abuse tactic.

I’ve spent an untold number of words on discussing all the ways in which Nadalind is unhealthy. Unless they eventually reveal that there was some magic going on somewhere, the way they’ve written the Nadalind relationship has been incredibly rushed, unrealistic, and grossly romanticized. Nick shacking up with his rapist–who has attacked every friend he has at least once, who is the main reason for what happened to Juliette in the first place, and who used the child resulting from raping him to emotionally manipulate him into helping her –is beyond twisted.

And on the other side of it, Adalind suddenly being in love with the man who helped steal her first child from her, and trusting him when he says no one will take her second child, makes zero sense to me. Even disregarding every other bad thing that’s happened between them, I cannot imagine a mother who loves her children–as Adalind clearly does–being willing to even entertain taking that risk with one child after having lost another.

The whole thing with Adalind is very complicated, as you say, and I think part of that is due to some messy writing, honestly. The Grimm Writers do a good job with a lot of things, but Adalind’s arc and ostensible “redemption” has not been one of them. And unfortunately, that goes for anywhere her arc intertwines with the other characters’ as well.

Are Nick and Adalind Stiller together?

It’s a bit difficult to say, but on balance I’d say…for all intents and purposes, no.

It’s not as if we got a traditional “break-up” scene, but Adalind did leave him and doesn’t appear to have any plans to return to him any time soon. Add to that the fact that they’re both pretty wrapped up in surviving their respective situations, and somehow I think their relationship status is probably so far down their priority ladder that it’s fallen off the bottom rung.

If or when they actually have the time and space to revisit that question again, a lot of things will have changed. Juliette is back, and it’s clear from Nick’s behavior toward her that he hasn’t moved past his feelings for her, as tangled and convoluted as they may be by what happened last season. And Adalind now has a daughter who’s shown something of a volatile streak towards people who aren’t either of her parents trying to date either of her parents. 

Granted, she didn’t seem to have a problem with Nick toward the end of that episode (and may have even acted to save him and not just to punish Conrad for hurting Adalind). But still…that might change if she were to see Adalind and Nick together, especially if the first thing Nick does in season six is go all decapitare on her dad.

So basically, it’s complicated. But for the moment? No, they’re not.

Eve/Juliette and Adalind are clearly very connected. They can feel each others’ emotions and pain.

So what if…what if that is why Adalind thought she was in love with Nick this whole time? Because she was feeling all of Juliette’s suppressed emotions, like they got shifted to her somehow?

Yes, Thank God, is Grimm day today *O* Do you think Eve was evil ? And please, don’t tell me you ship Nadalind too ÂŹÂŹ

Hi there @sweetweasleygirl, admin Liz here! I don’t think Eve is evil. According to this interview with Bitsie, evil isn’t the right word. Focused and weaponized sound like more appropriate descriptors. I’m looking forward to seeing where they go with it!

I, personally, don’t ship Nadalind. I don’t mind them getting along for the sake of the child, but their history is to violent and filled with non-consensual actions for me to ever be able to ship them. I have no issue with Adalind coming over to the light side and trying to redeem herself, but I won’t ever be able to get behind a Nadalind romantic relationship (whether it becomes canon or not.)

I adore Adalind, and LOVE Claire Coffee, but I’ll always been Silverhardt at… well, heart.